"Write As You Would Talk" - Or Should You?
Dianna Booher, CSP
You may have heard this adage to writers with a stuffy style, who fill their documents with
"please be advised," "pursuant to our meeting," and "enclosed herewith."
Generally, "to write as you talk" is good advice. But misunderstood, that advice leads to
rambling prose. Instead of a period, writers often succumb to a confusing habit of linking
scrambled thoughts with "which":
"I emailed my broker about the problem with the duplicate entries on my
IRA account, which he said was fairly common when you make two
years' contribution with the same check, which I did this January,
including a contribution for the previous year along with the contribution
for the current year, which is, of course, expedient for my purposes but not
for the broker. They've made several errors recently, which is why I had
to re-send the last paycheck deposit twice, which is becoming a problem
for our own payroll department, which is responsible for stopping
payment on checks and reissuing them when there's a problem, which is
what I had to ask them to do this past payroll period."
Speakers often punctuate with "which" and a breath. Writers should not.
By all means, on most occasions, write as you would talk. That is, use a conversational tone,
informal word choice, and flowing sentence patterns--but without grammatical errors, repetition,
and disjointed ideas.
© Dianna Booher, Booher Consultants, Inc.
Author of 42 books (Simon & Schuster/Pocket, Warner, and McGraw-Hill), Dianna Booher, CSP, CPAE, delivers programs on communication and life-balance issues. Her latest books: Speak with Confidence, Your Signature Life, Your Signature Work, E-Writing, and Communicate with Confidence. For more information, visit www.booher.com or call 800-342-6621.
|